Cases 1 - 10 of 205
SCOTT v. BOBBITT
as 4:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
DEMETRICE SCOTT
Respondent:
Warden TREVONZA BOBBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobbitt v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 4:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mason Bobbitt
Defendant:
US Marshals, USA and PCRDF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sheets v. Bobbitt
as 1:2023cv05999
Petitioner:
Mulik Sheets
Respondent:
Trevonza Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. BOBBITT et al
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
TREVELIS D JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN BOBBITT, DEPUTY WARDEN PEOPLES, OFFICER MARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobbitt v. Locklear
as 5:2023hc02217
Petitioner:
Deon Patrick Bobbitt
Respondent:
Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Bobbitt
as 1:2023cv03524
Petitioner:
Quentin Lamar Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Trevonza Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUSSEY v. BOBBITT
as 3:2023cv00151
Petitioner:
Arthur Shermaine Bussey
Respondent:
WARDEN BOBBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUSSEY v. BOBBITT
as 5:2023cv00273
Petitioner:
ARTHUR SHERMAINE BUSSEY
Respondent:
WARDEN BOBBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bobbitt v. Martuscello III
as 1:2023cv04909
Plaintiff:
Richard Bobbitt
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
