Cases 1 - 10 of 300
Broussard v. Gaido
as 4:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Ardis Broussard
Defendant:
Judge Kathryn Colleen Gaido
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broussard v. USA
as 0:2024cv00756
Petitioner:
Aaron Rhy Broussard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Broussard v. Strength et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Neil Patrick Broussard
Defendant:
Bryan Strength, Correctional Officer and Correctional Deputy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broussard v. Strimple
as 6:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Roderick Broussard
Defendant:
Shelley Strimple and Melissa Tyroch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Madison County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2023cv01758
Plaintiff:
Willie B Mason, Jr
Defendant:
Madison County Sheriff's Department, State of Alabama/23rd Judicial Circuit, Linda F Coats and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broussard v. People of the State of California
as 3:2023cv06107
Petitioner:
Calton Broussard
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Galveston County Deputy et al
as 3:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
George Lee Grimes
Defendant:
Galveston County Deputy, B Broussard, C Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broussard v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00166
Petitioner:
Aaron Rhy Broussard
Respondent:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Broussard v. USA
as 4:2023cv00707
Petitioner:
Vernice Dion Broussard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sharifi v. Broussard
as 5:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
Robert Broussard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
