Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
TONY C. JACKSON, JR.
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
TONY C JACKSON, JR
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Bess
as 4:2024cv00212
Petitioner:
Taiwansley C. Jackson
Respondent:
Douglas Burris and Kito Bess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Madison)
as 8:2024cv00345
Petitioner:
Tony C. Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Michael A Johnson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Shipman, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Bates et al
as 4:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
Taiwansley C. Jackson
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Bates, Officer Unknown Wallace, Officer Unknown Mercurio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Jackson v. Tammy Williams
as 23-6856
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD C. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMMY WILLIAMS, Warden of DFCC, MARK ENGELKE, Director of Food Service and NATARCHA GREGG, State Dietician
Jackson v. Woods et al
as 1:2023cv04846
Plaintiff:
Isaac C. Jackson
Defendant:
E. Woods, Sgt. Peck and Sgt Reinhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Sarah Huckabee, Arkansas Division of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
