Cases 1 - 10 of 215
Steve C. Moore v. David Holdbrook
as 2:2024cv06830
Respondent:
Mr. David Holdbrook
Petitioner:
Mr. Steve C. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kakowski v. SGT Gonzales et al
as 3:2024cv01314
Defendant:
L.T. C. Moore, Howard Moseley, Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Kakowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. SOLOMON et al
as 1:2024cv01128
Defendant:
SANDERS, SOLOMON and SHAFFERS
Plaintiff:
REONTE C. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. ERNEST et al
as 1:2024cv00899
Defendant:
JASON ERNEST, MARTIN and D. REAGLE
Plaintiff:
REONTE C. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. E Baton Rouge City Prsh
as 24-30318
Defendant:
J. Geen, Tanner Jenkins, K-9 Datoka and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James, real party in interest Conner A. James
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christiaan Davis v. James Gilliam, et al
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAAN DIOR DAVIS
Defendant:
JAMES GILLIAM, ROCHELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF ROCHELLE, ILLINOIS and others
Garner v. East Baton Rouge District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2023cv01650
Plaintiff:
Demetric Rashord Garner
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge District Attorney's Office, Jason Robinson, Hillar C. Moore, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Gilliam et al
as 3:2023cv50335
Plaintiff:
Christiaan Dior Davis
Defendant:
Sgt James Gilliam, Rochelle Police Department, City of Rochelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Gilliam et al
as 1:2023cv13150
Plaintiff:
Christiaan Dior Davis
Defendant:
Sgt James Gilliam, Rochelle Police Department, City of Rochelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
