Cases 1 - 10 of 78
MILLER v. SEVIER
as 1:2024cv00972
Petitioner:
CHARLES MILLER
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elliott v. Stevens
as 1:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Elliott
Defendant:
Bobbie J. Stevens, Sgt. Bryan Barney, Venrot Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDavid v. Gonzalez
as 23-10885
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam Gonzalez, Head Warden, Michael Miller, Assistant Warden, David S. Dyer, High Security and others
Kelly v. Caudillo
as 23-10572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jacob James Kelly
Defendant / Appellee:
Olivia Caudillo, David Dyer, Cody Parker and others
McDavid v. Gonzalez
as 23-10427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam Gonzalez, Head Warden, Michael Miller, Assistant Warden, David S. Dyer, High Security and others
Smith v. Indiana Parole Board et al
as 3:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Smith and Jerry Antwon Smith
Defendant:
Indiana Parole Board, G Horth, Thor Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Caudillo
as 23-10330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jacob James Kelly
Defendant / Appellee:
Olivia Caudillo, David Dyer, Cody Parker and others
(PC) Miller v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Charles Miller
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Thomas et al v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Thomas, Terrence Dunson, Michael Greene and others
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J. Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KREILEIN v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
ALAN KREILEIN
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA, TRACY BERRY, LAURA KLOIMWEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
