Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Johnson v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv04116
Respondent:
South Dakota Attorney General, Darrian Young and Doug Clark
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Summit Food Service et al
as 4:2021cv04016
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Jordan Moose, Jay Baker, Summit Food Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Meadows et al
as 4:2020cv04049
Defendant:
Ernest Meadows, Summit Food Services and Catering By Marlins
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Springfield Prison
as 4:2019cv04002
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson and Charles Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Springfield Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv00512
Plaintiff:
Rafel Antion Jackson
Defendant:
Charles Ray Johnson, Dorthy Lee, Chris Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Johnson v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 15-20133
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES RAY JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
Johnson v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 4:2014cv01055
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Johnson
Respondent:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Owens et al
as 4:2013cv00954
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Rissie Owens, Stuart Jenkins and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laws v. Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv01743
Plaintiff:
Johnathon David Laws
Defendant:
Charles Ray Johnson, Ron Griffin, Emfinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thaler
as 6:2011cv00189
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Johnson
Respondent:
Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
