Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Christopher Smith v. David Dawdy, et al
as 23-2043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CARSON SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID DAWDY, Corrections Mental Health Program Director, official and personal capacity, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, official capacity, GREG JOHNSON, Corrections Mental Health Program Involuntary Treatment, personal capacity and others
Smith v. Markwell et al
as 2:2023cv11067
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carson Smith
Defendant:
Chad E. Markwell, Magen Oaks, Heidi Washington and others
Hart v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv01126
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Connie D Cook, Tina Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonix v. Nunag et al
as 4:2020cv00179
Defendant:
Connie D Cook, Doe, Nunag and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Ashton Lonix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tang v. Fort Bend County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2016cv02957
Plaintiff:
Toan T Tang
Defendant:
Fort Bend County Sheriff's Office, Lt. Kovar, Connie D Lilly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owusu v. Michigan Department of Corrections Pain Management Committee et al
as 5:2016cv12490
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel K. Owusu
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections Pain Management Committee, Corizon Health, Inc., Gary R. Kerstein and others
Montgomery v. Loper et al
as 1:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Stanley Montgomery (DO NOT FILE)
Defendant:
Joseph H. Loper, Jr., Marshall Fisher, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. The State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
Stanley Montgomery
Defendant:
The State of Mississippi, The Mississippi Department of Corrections, Joseph H. Loper, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Winston County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Stanley Montgomery
Defendant:
Winston County Sheriff's Department, Connie D. Hampton, Michael Ming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
