Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Joya-Cabrera v. County of Clinton et al
as 9:2024cv00863
Defendant:
William Earle, Clinton County Sheriff's Office, Rachel Sitts and others
Plaintiff:
Mariano Joya-Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starke v. County of Clinton
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 9:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Arthur (Artie) Starke
Defendant:
County of Clinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey et al v. The United States of America et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2021cv00574
Plaintiff:
Jhonali One Eye El-Bey, Moorish American National and Indigenous Tribal Government
Defendant:
The United States of America, The State Of Ohio, The Ohio Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hehrer v. Clinton, County of et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2020cv01079
Defendant:
Sergeant Chad Bashore, James Burdick, Dawn Thelen, L.P.N. and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Hehrer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario v. County of Clinton et al
as 9:2011cv00550
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rosario
Defendant:
County of Clinton, Favreau, David N. Favro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWACKHAMMER v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2007cv02030
Petitioner:
Frederick J. Swackhammer
Respondent:
Marilyn Brooks, District Attorney of the County of Clinton and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SWACKHAMMER v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2007cv00284
Petitioner:
FREDERICK J. SWACKHAMMER
Respondent:
MARILYN BROOKS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CLINTON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.