Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Crisostomo v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Marjorie Francisco Crisostomo
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman and Dawn Noggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRISOSTOMO v. DEMARCO et al
as 1:2023cv03903
Plaintiff:
JOSE CRISOSTOMO
Defendant:
SGT. DEMARCO and OFFICER BLACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mathews v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023cv01021
Plaintiff:
James Lee Mathews
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Jim Cooper, Yee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kendrid v. Marzan et al
as 2:2022cv02301
Plaintiff:
Forrest Kendrid
Defendant:
- Marzan, Crisostomo, Manuel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crisostomo v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Crisostomo
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Wally Villagomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC)Diaz v. Lynch et al
as 2:2021cv00916
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Yalung Crisostomo, Maria Tobcedo and others
Plaintiff:
Flipe Polanco Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopes v. Kenneway
as 1:2019cv10674
Petitioner:
Crisostomo Lopes
Respondent:
Superintendent Steven Kenneway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stribling v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
as 4:2018cv03479
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lamont Stribling
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Ross Haynie, Duane Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Crisostomo v. Ray Ormond, et al
as 16-6846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CRISOSTOMO
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY ORMOND, Warden, LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, IAN CONNORS, Inmate Appeals and others
Pratt v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv08278
Plaintiff:
Charles Pratt
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Police Dept. Housing Authority and Ernesto Crisostomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
