Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Scott v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Curtis Scott
Respondent:
Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Curtis Scott
Respondent:
Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Arbon et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Curtis Scott Williams
Defendant:
Ryan Arbon, Phillip Reese, Zachary Campbell and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. USA
as 4:2021cv11980
Petitioner:
Curtis Scott
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Warrick et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2017cv03326
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Ocean, Correctional Officer Sgt. Lockemy, Correctional Officer Parker and others
Plaintiff:
James Hardin, John State, David Warrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Scott v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2019cv02238
Plaintiff:
Curtis Scott
Defendant:
Annie Sellers, Willie Eagleton, South Carolina Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Valdez, et al.
as 1:2017cv00777
Plaintiff:
Curtis Scott
Defendant:
B. Valdez, N. Korkow, J. Villegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Valdez, et al.
as 2:2017cv01117
Plaintiff:
Curtis Scott
Defendant:
B. Valdez, N. Korkow, J. Villegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Thompson et al
as 1:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Curtis Scott Williams
Defendant:
Terry Thompson, Klint Anderson, Kevin Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Biter
as 1:2016cv00386
Petitioner:
Curtis Scott
Respondent:
M. D. Biter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
