Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Banshu v. Haggler et al
as 1:2024cv03524
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sholomo S. Haggler, James Edward D'Auguste, Denis Michael Reo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banshu v. Haggler et al
as 1:2024cv03128
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sholomo S. Haggler, James Edward D'Auguste, Denis Michael Reo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dillard v. Akinode et al
as 7:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Dillard
Defendant:
Sergeants Oluyemi Akinode, Daniel B. Manyango, Obadina S. Omoaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Akinode et al
as 6:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Dillard
Defendant:
Sergeants Oluyemi Akinode, Daniel B. Manyango, Obadina S. Omoaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Davis
as 24-10006
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dillard
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Former Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jimmy S. Smith, Senior Warden, Elbert G. Holmes, Former Assistant Warden and others
Bellamy v. State of Kansas, et al
as 23-3259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE ALLEN BELLAMY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, KANSAS CIVIL SERVICE and others
Utecht, Daniel v. Buesgen, Christopher
as 3:2023cv00792
Petitioner:
Daniel D. Utecht
Respondent:
Christopher Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sease v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01388
Petitioner:
Daniel D Sease
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Backus v. Glassel et al
as 9:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Caterrion Backus
Defendant:
Kent Glassel, Scott W. Grimm, Caulder R. Schwarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malone v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50348
Plaintiff:
William Malone and Bill
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
