Cases 1 - 10 of 158
KENDRICK v. WHISTLER et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Defendant:
RICHARD OLETO CHANG, DARLA KAY WHISTLER, JUSTIN AUSTIN TORRES and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAMONT KENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karl Manuel v. Mark Capozza, et al
as 24-1396
Plaintiff:
KARL B. MANUEL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK CAPOZZA, C/O SERGEANT WILES, C/O. LT. DAILEY and others
May v. Bell et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
Alonzo May
Respondent:
Michael Bell, Carol Savage, Jennifer Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Bell et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Alonzo May
Defendant:
Michael Bell, Carol Savage, Jennifer Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Mellor
as 8:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
Darla Ideus and Matthew Mellor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McSean v. Hacker et al
as 4:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Denise Hacker, George Killian, William Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maurer v. Franklin et al
as 3:2023cv02303
Plaintiff:
Jason Maurer
Defendant:
County of Franklin, Melissa Morgan, Darla Fitzjerrells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. McLane, et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Respondent:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
