Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 162
Clark v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-5044
Plaintiff: DAVID GEORGE CLARK
Defendant: STATE OF OKLAHOMA, KEVIN STITT, Governor, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director and others
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2024cv00252
Petitioner: DAVID FRANCIS CLARK
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Clark v. State of Oklahoma, et al.
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: David George Clark
Defendant: State of Oklahoma, Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00533
Petitioner: David George Clark
Respondent: State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. Hayden et al
as 5:2023cv00134
Plaintiff: D'Andre Thomas Porter
Defendant: J. Hayden, David D. Clark, Det. Blake Maness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Carr, Jr. v. Jason Baranek, et al
as 23-2069
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT CARR, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: JASON BARANEK and DAVID A. CLARKE, JR.
Carr v. Baranek et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00414
Plaintiff: Robert Carr, Jr
Defendant: Jason Baranek and David A Clarke, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2022cv00835
Petitioner: DAVID FRANCIS CLARK and PREZ
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Clark v Crow
as 4:2022cv00334
Defendant: David George Clark and Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff: David George Clark
Defendant: State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Tulsa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?