Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Cathey v. Anderson
as 3:2022cv00037
Petitioner:
King David Jai Wynte Cathey
Respondent:
Krista Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hannah (ID 111383) v. Cline et al
as 5:2018cv03204
Defendant:
(fnu) Almond, Douglas W. Burris, Sam Cline and others
Plaintiff:
David Jay Hannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2018cv01483
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Warden Brian Williams, Offender Management Division and others
Plaintiff:
David Jay Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAY-BEY v. BERNSTEIN
as 1:2018cv00845
Plaintiff:
MONTRELL GAY-BEY
Defendant:
DAVID JAY BERNSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens #623851 v. Kowalski
as 2:2018cv00048
Petitioner:
David Jay Owens #623851
Respondent:
Jack Kowalski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sponsler v. Goldsmith et al
as 4:2014cv00223
Plaintiff:
David Jay Sponsler
Defendant:
Paul Goldsmith, Brett Tharp and Clint Neis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butterbaugh v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00413
Petitioner:
David Jay Butterbaugh, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Benak v. Yavapai County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2013cv08115
Plaintiff:
David Jay Benak
Defendant:
Yavapai County Board of Supervisors, Unknown Mascher, William Kunish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benak et al v. Yavapai County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2013cv08004
Plaintiff:
David Jay Benak, Jose L Islas, Jerry Shelton, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Yavapai County Board of Supervisors, Unknown Mascher, William Kunish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrnes v. Scott et al
as 3:2011cv00604
Plaintiff:
David Jay Byrnes, Rule 23 and John/Jane Doe
Defendant:
Rick Scott, John/Jane Does, Randall C. Berg, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: bvcmp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
