Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Line v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00708
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Line
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Roth v. McBride et al
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Roth, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown McBride, Jane Doe, Amanda Harris and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glidewell v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Glidewell
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivers v. Janica
as 6:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Rivers
Respondent:
Sheriff Kelly Janica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis Uptain v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 22-16865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS LEE UPTAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF DIRECTORS and UNKNOWN PARTY, Listed as Sheriffs Canteen
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03921
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Richardson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis Walls v. Superintendent Smithfield SCI, et al
as 22-3085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS LEE WALLS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SMITHFIELD SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Patterson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00470
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Patterson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00180
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Patterson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Uptain v. Penzone et al
as 2:2022cv01751
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Uptain
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Board of Directors and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
