Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Demos v. State of Washington et al
as 4:2017cv05025
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Washington, State of Colorado, U.S. Maritime Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Washington, State of Colorado, U.S. Maritime Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Rivera v. Michael Hayden, et al
as 10-14541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT F. RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HAYDEN, Director Central Intel., U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Asa Hutchinson, Secretary, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Electra Theo Corides, Exec. Director and others
Adrian Smith v. South Carolina
as 10-6317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN MARION SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY PATROL and J C GAMBRELL, Badge No 514
Smith v. South Carolina Department of Highway Patrol
as 3:2008cv03519
Plaintiff:
Adrian Marion Smith
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Highway Patrol
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holmes v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement et al
as 6:2008cv01546
Plaintiff:
Jariel Q. Holmes
Defendant:
Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Brevard County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rivera v. Hayden et al
as 1:2007cv23336
Plaintiff:
Vincent F. Rivera
Defendant:
Michael Hayden, United States Department of Transporation, Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
PENNINGTON v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES et al
as 3:2007cv00022
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JAY PENNINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
