Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Thomas Dewald v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 24-1580
Petitioner:
THOMAS ANDREW DEWALD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Dewald v. Hollenbaugh et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Dewald
Respondent:
Ken Hollenbaugh and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Dewald v. French, et al
as 23-3268
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW DEWALD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRENCH, Franklin County Prison, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER REED, Franklin County Prison, LIEUTENANT GARY ARTER and others
Dewald v. Livers et al
as 3:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Bart Dewald
Defendant:
Dorthy Livers, Centurion Health Care Employees, Andrew Liaw and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dewald v. French et al
as 1:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Dewald
Defendant:
Correctional Officer French, Correctional Officer Reed, Lieutenant Gary Arter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aplin v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Colby Aplin
Defendant:
B. Smith, Dewald, Fraser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dewald v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv01579
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Dewald
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail and PrimeCare Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bieri #288329 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2020cv00415
Defendant:
Unknown Dewald, W. Anderson, R. Rewerts and others
Plaintiff:
Jack C. Bieri #288329
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEWALD v. BETTI et al
as 2:2020cv00205
Respondent:
TIMOTHY BETTI and DAVID BYRNE
Petitioner:
DAVID EUGENE DEWALD, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dewald II v. Varano et al
as 1:2020cv00023
Petitioner:
David E. Dewald II
Respondent:
David Varano, Timothy Betti and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
