Cases 1 - 10 of 164
United States of America v. Dobbins
as 1:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Albert Dobbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Wright v. Lumpkin
as 23-11251
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dephne Nguyen Wright
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Janet Harry-Dobbins, Warden
Hartley v. Dobbins et al
as 2:2023cv04212
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Hartley
Defendant:
Dobbins, Knapp, Schaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00753
Petitioner:
Dephne Nguyen Wright
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Janet Harry-Dobbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alrelio Evans v. Willis Chapman, et al
as 23-1549
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALRELIO EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIS CHAPMAN, Warden, KRISTOPHER STEECE, Assistant Deputy Warden, PRISON COUNSELOR VANN and others
Webster v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv10704
Plaintiff:
Mark Webster
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, MRF, FNU Montgomery and others
Evans v. Chapman et al
as 4:2023cv10263
Plaintiff:
Alrelio L. Evans
Defendant:
Willie Chapman, Kristopher Steece, Vann and others
Roderick Washington v. Jackie Lacey, et al
as 22-56044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKIE LACEY, SHEN JAY FERN, ROBERT JACKSON and others
Roderick Washington v. Jackie Lacey, et al
as 22-55881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKIE LACEY, SHEN JAY FERN, ROBERT JACKSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
