Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Rose v. Northern Division of Parole
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Rose
Defendant:
Northern Division of Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Borchers v. Arizona Board of Executive Clemency et al
as 2:2024cv00805
Petitioner:
Douglas C Borchers
Respondent:
Arizona Board of Executive Clemency and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Walker v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv07208
Plaintiff:
Trendell Walker
Defendant:
United States of America, Breon Peace, James H. Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Walker v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv03864
Plaintiff:
Trendell Walker
Defendant:
United States of America, Christopher C. Caffarone, Mark E. Misorek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Chambers v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2021cv02811
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Chambers
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borchers v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv08170
Respondent:
Arizona Department of Corrections and Arizona Board of Executive Clemency
Petitioner:
Douglas C Borchers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Letzelter v. Annucci et al
as 1:2020cv00630
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Letzelter
Defendant:
K. Walker, Anthony J. Annucci, Douglas C. Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibboney v. Ransom
as 2:2019cv03534
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General and Superintendent Ransom
Petitioner:
Douglas C. Gibboney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
