Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Coleman v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv16292
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Deon Coleman
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, E Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Douglas County et al
as 2:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
Douglas E Duncan
Defendant:
Douglas County Illinois, Nate Chaplin, Skyler Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parson v. Vanallen et al
as 3:2018cv00913
Defendant:
C. Williams, C. Collins, C. Lavoie and others
Plaintiff:
Davion Parson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Robinson et al
as 3:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Duncan
Defendant:
Haskell, K. Johnson, Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
as 3:2017cv00430
Petitioner:
Charles E Duncan
Respondent:
Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duncan v. Olivas et al
as 3:2017cv00460
Defendant:
Bellinger, Bennett, Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernandez v. Austria et al
as 1:2016at00885
Plaintiff:
James Fernandez
Defendant:
A. Austria , L. Agbayani , E. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNCAN v. JULIAN
as 2:2016cv00346
Petitioner:
CRISS E. DUNCAN
Respondent:
S. JULIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Criss Duncan v. USA
as 14-1503
Petitioner - Appellant:
CRISS E. DUNCAN
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Price v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division et al
as 1:2013cv00159
Plaintiff:
Chavez D. Price
Defendant:
Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, FNU Pittman, L Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
