Cases 1 - 10 of 31
EUTSEY v. FCI SANDSTONE et al
as 2:2023cv03871
Petitioner:
KEITH EUTSEY
Respondent:
FCI SANDSTONE, BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eutsey v. Davis et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Derrick Eutsey
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Davis and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tony Jackson v. Joseph McCray, et al
as 22-1971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH MCCRAY, C/O, also known as MCCRAW, DALTON EUTSEY, C/O and JOHN DOE, Sergeant, Tact Team Supervisor
Jackson v. McCraw et al
as 3:2021cv50046
Defendant:
McCraw, Illinois Department of Corrections, Dixon Corr. Ctr. and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 2:2020cv03301
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 5:2020cv00981
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Governor Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boston v. Eutsey et al
as 1:2020cv01151
Defendant:
. Eutsey, . Anderson, . Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Norris Boston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCloud v. Harmon et al
as 1:2020cv01043
Defendant:
Dalton Eutsey, K Tarter, Teri Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph McCloud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGE-JONES v. WETSEL et al
as 2:2018cv00934
Defendant:
JOHN WETSEL, BRIAN COLEMAN, LT. ALBRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
AKEEM PAGE-JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PAGE-JONES v. CAPOZZI et al
as 2:2018cv00635
Plaintiff:
AKEEM PAGE-JONES
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT LANEL CAPOZZI, DEPUTY NICKELSON, LT. ALBRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
