Cases 1 - 10 of 234
Glover, Jr. v. Pharmacist et al
as 4:2023cv03324
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Glover, Jr.
Defendant:
Pharmacist, Samuel Adesoba, NPR Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Glover Jr v. Eke et al
as 4:2023cv02647
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Glover Jr and Earnest Lee Glover, Jr.
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Eke and Correctional Officer Arenau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv04113
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Glover, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Unknown Longoro and Unknown Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover v. Sharee et al
as 6:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Glover, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Sharee, Warden Unknown Ragsdale, Warden Unknown Steigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover v. Collier et al:
as 6:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Glover, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Unknown Longoro and Unknown Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover v. Good2go Publishing
as 2:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Glover
Defendant:
Good2go Publishing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover v. Warden Tovar et al
as 4:2022cv01280
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Glover
Defendant:
Warden Tovar and Property Officer Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, II v. Salamon et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
Earnest Lee Jones, II
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glover, Jr. v. Inmate Trust Fund
as 4:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Glover, Jr.
Defendant:
Inmate Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGilBerry v. Morris et al
as 4:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Phillip Charles McGilBerry
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Johnnie Denmark and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
