Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Diggs v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Unit Manager B. Smith and Sergeant EC Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. South Correctional Entity et al
as 2:2022cv01688
Plaintiff:
EC Edward Cobb
Defendant:
South Correctional Entity, Brooks, Steve Orten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2022cv00403
Defendant:
Watts, John Galipeau, Matthew Pryor and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Smith
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. South Correctional Entity et al
as 2:2020cv00607
Defendant:
South Correctional Entity, Grievance Program Manager, Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
EC Edward Cobb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00608
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and State of Washington
Petitioner:
EC Edward Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. ATF UC 3749 et al
as 3:2018cv00899
Undetermined:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Nick McClaughen, Det Stutsman, DEA 6 and others
Plaintiff:
Enedeo Rodriguez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Griffin et al
as 7:2018cv09654
Defendant:
Ece, Thomas Griffin, Mr. Ail and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice V. Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sean Ryan v. Corizon Health Inc, et al
as 14-1794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN MICHAEL RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH INC., MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES) #1, named as yet to be discovered staff employed by Corizon Medical and others
Sean Ryan v. MDOC, et al
as 14-1442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN MICHAEL RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNKNOWN STODDARD, Warden, UNKNOWN JENSEN, Correctional Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
