Cases 1 - 10 of 549
Evatt v. Comprehensive Life Resources
as 3:2024cv05790
Defendant:
Comprehensive Life Resources
Plaintiff:
Scott Emerson Evatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01609
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARRIS
Defendant:
HEATHER VERDON and DONALD EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SERNA v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01616
Respondent:
ODELL, IYC, DONALD EMERSON and others
Petitioner:
RONALD SERNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evatt v. Simbeck et al
as 3:2024cv05772
Plaintiff:
Scott Emerson Evatt
Defendant:
Kirk Medina, Brandon Avalos and Paul Simbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Emerson Norton v. Israel Jacquez
as 5:2024cv01852
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Defendant:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Abdikarim v. Emerson et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Ayannah Charette, Kent Cameron Carlson, City of Fargo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Jahner et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Respondent:
Sheriff Jesse Jahner, Paul Emerson, Kimberlee Hegvik and others
Petitioner:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abdikarim v. Emerson et al
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Paul R. Emerson and Kimberly Higvick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASHER-BUTLER v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv01438
Defendant:
CHARLES EMERSON, PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
ALLEN LEE ASHER-BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01450
Defendant:
S. VARGUS, DONALD EMERSON, S. OBI and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
