Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Fillmore v. State of Florida Prosecutor's Office for Broward County et al
as 0:2024cv60132
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Fillmore
Defendant:
State of Florida Prosecutor's Office for Broward County, Michael J. Satz, Christina Strandell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Strawmatt v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv02707
Plaintiff:
Patrick Strawmatt
Defendant:
Andre Moses Stancil, Andre Moses (I) Stancil, Randall Maul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
GARDNER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv04865
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN MCNESBY, RAYMOND HARLEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinonez Velez et al v. Emerson
as 1:2020cv00516
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Porras Quintero, Moises Gamboa, Jorge Ramos and others
Defendant:
Donald Emerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04313
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
DAVIS v. PERRI
as 2:2018cv03243
Plaintiff:
MICAH DAVIS
Defendant:
FORTUNATO N. PERRI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Febus v. Somody et al
as 3:2018cv00640
Plaintiff:
Fortunato K. Febus
Defendant:
Robert Somody, Joseph Rainone, Unknown Police Sergeant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sagesse v. Bastedo et al
as 2:2018cv00225
Plaintiff:
Rones Sagesse
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Bastedo, Joseph M. Clark, Gregory Ream and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Febus v. CCS Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2017cv03408
Plaintiff:
Fortunato K. Febus
Defendant:
CCS Correct Care Solutions, Feldmen and County Of Orange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
