Cases 1 - 10 of 49
BEY v. FULLERTON et al
as 2:2024cv00584
Petitioner:
ZAMA ELOAH BEY
Respondent:
WILLIAM FULLERTON and PUBLIC SERVANT SCHULUCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Fullerton v. Saxon et al
as 2:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
Raymond W. Fullerton
Defendant:
Tim Saxon, Max Mucklow, Michael Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collier v. Whithall Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02656
Plaintiff:
Denette Collier
Defendant:
Whithall Police Department, Officer Bruce Stephen, Officer Noah Fullerton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Watkins v. Davids et al
as 2:2023cv11472
Plaintiff:
Antonio Demond Watkins
Defendant:
John Davids, Jonathan Poulos, G. David Guinn and others
Marlon Blacher v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-55818
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARLON BLACHER, AKA Marlon Jessie Blacher
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden, ALL CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATIVE SEGREGATION CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS AND MEDICAL DEPARTMENT STAFFING PERSONS and others
Dean v. Powlle et al
as 4:2022cv03029
Plaintiff:
JaRon Dean
Defendant:
Powlle, Jane Doe, Toft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James John Rangel v. Fullerton Police Department
as 2:2021cv09036
Plaintiff:
James John Rangel
Defendant:
Fullerton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rangel v. Fullerton Police Department
as 4:2021cv07156
Plaintiff:
James John Rangel
Defendant:
Fullerton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. John Doe et al
as 1:2020cv07520
Defendant:
Dr. Uzu, Baldwin, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Fullerton et al
as 2:2020cv12172
Defendant:
Mark A. Ross, Mona Patterson, Judith A Fullerton and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
