Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01020
Plaintiff:
Victor Rodriguez
Defendant:
M.D. David D. Williams, Concetta M. Partrige and Kay G. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridley v. Correct Care et al
as 1:2018cv02398
Defendant:
Correct Care, Jared Anderson, Captain G. Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ridley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Haynesworth v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 2:2017cv03247
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Haynesworth
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions , South Carolina Department of Mental Health, C Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rawlings v. Arnold et al
as 2:2015cv02169
Plaintiff:
Derek Rawlings, Jr.
Defendant:
G. Arnold, K. Boykin, K. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weldon v. Ramstad-Hvass, et al
as 11-8104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE WELDON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERYL RAMSTAD-HVASS, Minnesota Department of Corrections Commissioner, JOAN FABIAN, Minnesota Department of Corrections Commissioner, DENNIS BENSON, Minnesota Department of Corrections Assistant Commissioner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv02743
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Arnold v. Anthony Kane
as 10-16956
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL G. ARNOLD
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY KANE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
