Cases 1 - 10 of 1,017
Jabbaar v. Desantis et al
as 1:2024cv24798
Defendant:
Katherine Fernandez-Rundle, Ashley Moody, Alberto Milian and others
Plaintiff:
Mujaahid Abdul Jabbaar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05533
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jabbaar v. Desantis et al
as 2:2024cv01084
Defendant:
Francis Suarez, Katherine Fernandez-Rundle, Ron Desantis and others
Plaintiff:
Mujaahid Abdul Jabbaar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLEMAN v. THIBEAULT et al
as 1:2024cv02003
Defendant:
SEVIER, T. THIBEAULT, D-UNIT CHAPLAIN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marlon McDougall v. Tyson, et al
as 24-3069
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT TYSON, GEO GROUP INC, Detention Center and NURSE FREELAND
Plaintiff:
MARLON MCDOUGALL
Reichert (PS) v. Barlow et al
as 1:2024cv02912
Defendant:
Theodore Mendoza, Gwenyth Barlow, GEO Group Inc., and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Anthony Reichert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danneman v. GEO Secured Services et al
as 1:2024cv04073
Defendant:
US Marshal Service Atlanta, Daniel Koye, Dr. Price and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Benjamin Danneman and Rozlyne Dawn Canterbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham, John v. Matos et al
as 9:2024cv81047
Defendant:
Dr Hipolito Matos and The GEO Group Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Farron Latham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 1:2024cv01380
Defendant:
MS. LANGLEY, SPEARS, GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL RANDELL WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Tatum et al
as 1:2024cv01447
Plaintiff:
Vernon Jermaine Mills
Defendant:
Ralph Stith, GEO Group, Inc. and Esker Tatum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
