Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Toccara Puller v. Arlington County Sheriff's Office
as 24-6264
Plaintiff:
TOCCARA YVONNE PULLER
Defendant:
ARLINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ARLINGTON COUNTY P&P, MEDIKO and others
Puller v. Arlington County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
Toccara Yvonne Puller
Defendant:
Arlington County Sheriff's Office, Arlington County P&P, Mediko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puller v. Arlington County Sheriffs Office et al
as 7:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Toccara Yvonne Puller
Defendant:
Arlington County Sheriffs Office, Arlington County P&P, Mediko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. State of Florida Dept. of Children and Families et al
as 6:2023cv01224
Petitioner:
Civica Simpson
Respondent:
State of Florida Dept. of Children and Families, Childrens Legal Services, GAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Godfrey et al v. City Of Joliet et al
as 1:2022cv06708
Plaintiff:
Toby Godfrey
Defendant:
City Of Joliet, Lukasz Gal, Adam Rosales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. McNamara et al
as 4:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Darnell Bonner
Defendant:
Brian McNamara, Gal and Mike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. TALNODGE et al
as 2:2019cv02880
Defendant:
CATHY M. TALNODGE, CO. R. CREAMER, LOVE and others
Plaintiff:
MR. DWAYNE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Suzette Gal
as 17-35890
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SUZETTE GULYAS GAL
Harris v. Brant et al
as 2:2017cv00935
Petitioner:
Stacy Harris
Respondent:
Jesse Brant, Odella Welch, Sandra Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Suzette Gal
as 16-36065
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SUZETTE GULYAS GAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
