Cases 1 - 10 of 882
Gentry v. Schneider
as 9:2024cv01002
Respondent:
A. Schneider
Petitioner:
Matthew Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rayburn v. West Siloam Springs, Oklahoma et al
as 5:2024cv05163
Defendant:
Gentry, Arkansas, California Fusion Centers, Lodi, California and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Rayburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Charles Gentry Rodgers
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2024cv00333
Defendant:
Chad Page, Director of Wadda Potatoe Farms, Benjamin Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Charee Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02735
Petitioner:
Alfred Gentry
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonard v. Thomas et al
as 3:2024cv01780
Defendant:
Keyom Cualker, Nikeva Thomas, Alethea Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Gentry Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Schneider
as 1:2024cv00541
Respondent:
A. Schneider
Petitioner:
Matthew Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayberry v. Buss et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Defendant:
Thor R Miller, Gregory D. Server, Jane/John Doe 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marcus Mayberry
Unknown:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry Jr. v. Hidalgo et al
as 4:2024cv01945
Plaintiff:
Alfred Gentry Jr.
Defendant:
Ed Gonzales, Officer Paramar and Lina Hidalgo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
