Cases 1 - 10 of 42
PATEL v. CORNELL COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
KAMAL K. PATEL
Defendant:
CORNELL COMPANIES, INC., GEORGE KILLINGER, MICHAEL ZENK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel v. Cornell Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kamal K. Patel
Defendant:
Cornell Companies, Inc., George Killinger, Michael Zenk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel v. Cornell Companies, Inc. et al Do not docket. Case has been electronically transferred out.
as 2:2010cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kamal K. Patel
Defendant:
Cornell Companies, Inc., George Killinger, Michael Zenk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis McFadden v. George Snyder
as 10-7011
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANCIS HEMPSTON MCFADDEN
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE SNYDER, Warden
James Vines v. Warden George Snyder
as 10-6497
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR VINES
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE SNYDER, Warden and EDWARD REILLY, Chairman U.S. Parole Commission
Somie et al v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2009ct03142
Plaintiff:
Lascelles Somie and Oral Malcolm
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., George Snyder, David Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wilson v. Snyder et al
as 5:2009hc02080
Petitioner:
Alfonso Lumorris Wilson
Respondent:
George Snyder and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VINES v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2009hc02070
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Vines
Defendant:
George Snyder and Edward Reilly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VINES v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2009cv00813
Plaintiff:
JAMES ARTHUR VINES
Defendant:
GEORGE SNYDER and EDWARD REILLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Craig v. Snyder
as 5:2009hc02051
Petitioner:
Roscoe Leon Craig, III
Respondent:
George Snyder
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
