Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Woods v. Brown et al.
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
George Woods
Defendant:
Major Brown, Deputy Swartz and C/O John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Jerry George Wood Jr.
Respondent:
Jason Bennett, Superintendent, Stafford creek Correction Center and Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Bennett
as 2:2023cv00877
Petitioner:
Jerry George Wood, Jr
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayes #793413 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Wiley Gregory Mayes #793413
Defendant:
Sarah Schroeder, George Wood, Unknown Bedient and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Harry et al
as 4:2021cv01052
Defendant:
Officer J. Kiner, James Barnacle, Beth Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Barry George Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford #560561 v. Detroit, City of, et al
as 2:2020cv00256
Defendant:
G. Jack, Darryl Cross, George Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Seanderyl Crawford #560561
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Young et al
as 2:2018cv00983
Plaintiff:
Jerry George Wood, Jr.
Defendant:
Merkel, Kevin Young, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Hartl
as 2:2017cv01835
Plaintiff:
Jerry George Wood
Defendant:
Colleen A Hartl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Warden SCI Houtzdale, et al
as 11-3858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE WOODS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN SCI HOUTZDALE, DA DELAWARE COUNTY and ATTY GEN PA
WOODS v. WARDEN, SCI HOUTZDALE et al
as 2:2009cv02494
Petitioner:
GEORGE WOODS
Respondent:
WARDEN, SCI HOUTZDALE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
