Cases 1 - 10 of 11
PARKS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv20362
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL PARKS
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and GOVENER OF NEW JERSEY PHIL MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Engel v CO1 et al
as 4:2020cv01794
Defendant:
SG, Director, Govener and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v Govener of Missouri
as 4:2020cv01797
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant:
Govener of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v CO1 et al
as 4:2020cv01801
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant:
SG, Corizon Healthcare Director, Corizon Nurse Practicioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. CO1, et al
as 4:2020cv01734
Defendant:
Corizon Assist Superintendent, SG, Corizon Assist Director and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. Jefferson County et al
as 4:2020cv01687
Defendant:
House Rep MO, Assist Att General, Jeff Co Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Etowah Sheriffs Dept et al
as 1:2018cv03551
Plaintiff:
Leslie Sean Pruitt
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriffs Dept, Etowah Sheriffs Dept and Georgia Govener Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beall v. Hogan et al
as 8:2017cv00340
Plaintiff:
Richard Howard Beall, Jr.
Defendant:
Govener Lawrance Hogan, 2 East Staff, Paul Vince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bechtold v. Hogan et al
as 8:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Brian Anthony Bechtold
Defendant:
Govener Lawrance Hogan, Director Robinson, Tom Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goven v. Henderson et al
as 1:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
Felisha L. Goven
Defendant:
Patricia Henderson, Lee Hamilton and Daniel C. Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
