Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Lindsay
as 5:2024ct03025
Plaintiff:
Harold Lee Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Corey Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harold Williams v. Mary Benson, et al
as 16-3326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harold D. Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
Mary Benson, Stephen Veit, MD and Brad Wittrock, Acting Superintendent
Damon Willis, et al v. Charles Palmer, et al
as 16-3142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Damon Willis, Calvin Matlock, Dave L. Taft, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Charles Palmer, Director of the Iowa State Department of Human Resources and Cory Turner, Director of the Civil Commitment Program
Defendant:
Matthew Royster, Bob Stout, Bill Turner and others
Williams v. Wittrock et al SEE DISMISSED DEFENDANTS PER [2] IRO
as 5:2015cv04043
Plaintiff:
Harold D Williams
Defendant:
Brad Wittrock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Benson et al
as 5:2015cv04035
Plaintiff:
Harold D Williams
Defendant:
Mary Benson and Stephen Veit, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. UNION COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2015cv01408
Plaintiff:
HAROLD W. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Palmer et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - THE LEAD CASE TO DOCKET IN IS C12-4086DEO
as 5:2013cv04052
Plaintiff:
Harold D Williams
Defendant:
Charles Palmer, Matthew Royster, Bob Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Palmer et al
as 5:2012cv04045
Plaintiff:
Harold D Williams
Defendant:
Charles Palmer, Jason Smith, Mike Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. KELLER
as 1:2011cv00319
Petitioner:
HAROLD L. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harold Williams v. Jan Trombley
as 09-1977
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAROLD SPENCER WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAN E. TROMBLEY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
