Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Dale v. Stephens et al
as 2:2024cv02053
Plaintiff:
Jason Dale
Defendant:
Former Sheriff Jimmy Stephens, Sheriff Tom Hughes, Jail Administrator Jacob Schook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jimmie E. Stephens v. G. Matterson
as 2:2024cv02386
Petitioner:
Jimmie Stephens
Respondent:
Warden G. Matterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Justice v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dakota Justice
Defendant:
James Jackson, Gary Edward Johnson, Jimmy Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Stephens v. Bragg et al
as 2:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Stephens
Defendant:
L. Bragg, M. Kuersten, Primm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimmie Stephen v. Primm, et al
as 22-16992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMIE STEPHEN
Defendant / Appellee:
PRIMM, Sgt., L. DAVIS, Lt., M. CARSON, Sgt. and others
(PC)Stephens v. Felder et al
as 2:2022cv01791
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Earl Stephens and Jimmie Stephen
Defendant:
M. Felder, S. Gates and G. Matterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcum v. Capp et al
as 2:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ronald Marcum
Defendant:
Sarah Capp, Abby Yarbrough, David Saxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimmie Stephen v. G. Matteson
as 22-16541
Petitioner / Appellant:
JIMMIE STEPHEN
Respondent / Appellee:
G. MATTESON, Warden
(PC) Stephens v. Newsom et al
as 2:2022cv01583
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Stephens and Jimmie Earl Stephens
Defendant:
G. Newsom, Prasad, Yarmolyuk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
