Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
JACOBS v. CUZZUPE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05169
Plaintiff: JOHN JACOBS, III
Defendant: JOHN S. CUZZUPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOB v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2021cv02329
Petitioner: JOHN JACOB
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, ERIC ARMEL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Gullatt III v. Dirkse et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00473
Plaintiff: John Jacob Gullatt, III
Defendant: Daniel Hutsell, Brooke Smith, Miguel Villasenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raiford v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00218
Defendant: John Jacobs and Jerry Jones
Plaintiff: Darrin Raiford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver et al v. Lampert et al
as 2:2017cv00153
Plaintiff: Jonathan Oliver and James Lackey
Defendant: Robert O Lampert, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Eddie Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yorkey v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2016cv00096
Petitioner: John Jacob Yorkey
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Beener v. Mann et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00046
Plaintiff: Derrick Beener
Defendant: Jeffrey Mann and John Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: JOHN JACOB
as 2:2013cv07022
Petitioner: JOHN JACOB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Chamberlain v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 12-10647
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN JACOB CHAMBERLAIN
Respondent - Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
John Jacob Williams v. United State
as 11-1687
Petitioner - Appellant: John Jacob Williams
Respondent - Appellee: United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?