Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02266
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Epley v. Luong
as 23-40038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles E. Epley
Defendant / Appellee:
Hien Luong, D.D.S., Dorace L. Bedard, P.M.H.N.P., Wanda T. Hilliard, A.P.R.N. and others
RISTER v. BURKE et al
as 2:2021cv04846
Plaintiff:
TARRELL R. RISTER
Defendant:
JEFFERY BURKE, JOSEPH MURRAY and MATTHEW KROUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epley v. Luong D.D.S. et al
as 3:2020cv00043
Defendant:
Tawana Lakesha Smith, MD, Wanda T. Hilliard, APRN, Julia Renee Ward, MD and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Epley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandy Dickerson v. Owen Murray, et al
as 14-40146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDY DICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
OWEN JOSEPH MURRAY, UNKNOWN DOCTORS AND OFFICIALS, At University of Texas Medical Branch - Galveston, DOCTOR TARRY and others
Jessie Johnson v. Owen Murray, et al
as 13-20161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSIE LOUIS JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
OWEN JOSEPH MURRAY, D.O., S. JOHNSON, D.O. or M.D., SINGLETON, D.O. or M.D. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
M.D. BETTY WILLIAMS
Mello v. Murray
as 1:2012fp00207
Plaintiff:
Keith Mello
Defendant:
Joseph Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Murray et al
as 4:2011cv03395
Plaintiff:
Jessie L Johnson
Defendant:
Owen Joseph Murray, S Johnson, Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Murray et al
as 3:2011cv00200
Plaintiff:
Sandy Dickerson
Defendant:
Owen Joseph Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT et al
as 2:2009cv05336
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER, EDWARD SALERNO, DOUGLAS MINATEE and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, DR. MERRIL MAIN, CLERKE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
