Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hendrix Zikomo v. Teal Johnson
as 22-7260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENDRIX Z. ZIKOMO
Defendant / Appellee:
TEAL JOHNSON, COURTNEY REA, BRITTANY SCOTT and others
Hudson v. Bridges
as 6:2022cv00290
Petitioner:
James P. Hudson
Respondent:
Scott Crow, John O'Connell and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zikomo v. Greenville County 20 Mcgee Street 29601 et al
as 8:2022cv01595
Plaintiff:
Hendrix Z. Zikomo
Defendant:
Greenville County 20 Mcgee Street 29601, Henry McMaster, Teal Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Zikomo v. Johnson et al
as 6:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Hendrix Z. Zikomo
Defendant:
Teal Johnson, Courtney Rea, Brittany Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Workman v. State of South Carolina et al
as 6:2018cv03472
Defendant:
Sttorney General SC, Will Lewis, James E Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Olandio Workman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Workman v. Perry et al
as 6:2018cv01331
Plaintiff:
Olandio Ray Workman
Defendant:
Robert Perry, James E Hudson, Will Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. White et al
as 6:2017cv02695
Defendant:
Henry J Mimms, John Vandermosten, Robert F Simm and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Reid, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Workman v. Perry et al
as 6:2017cv00765
Plaintiff:
Olandio Ray Workman
Defendant:
Robert Joseph Perry, James E Hudson, Christopher Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson, James v. Meisner, Michael
as 3:2014cv00609
Petitioner:
James C. Hudson
Respondent:
Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hudson v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
James S Hudson
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America and Paul Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
