Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Williams v. Handley et al
as 5:2021cv01027
Petitioner:
James Otis Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Claude E Handley, III, Kimberly Kaye Tibbs, Kristy Diane Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Shelton et al
as 5:2021cv00998
Plaintiff:
James O Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Kristy Diana Shelton, Steven Jeffrey Shaw, Claude E Handley, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sanders et al
as 5:2019cv01118
Defendant:
Kristy Shelton, Paula Sanders, Jessica La'Shay Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
James Otis Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walsh v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2018cv04469
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Braxton C. Cotton, Brian Owens and others
Plaintiff:
William Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Alexander et al
as 5:2017cv01962
Plaintiff:
James Otis Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Darren Alexander, Jane Smith, McDaniel and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Williams et al
as 1:2017cv01652
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis
Defendant:
James Carlyle Williams, Jr., David M. Pascoe, Jr., Diane Shafer Goodstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sangamon County Jail
as 3:2014cv03064
Plaintiff:
James F Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Sangamon County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Rush et al
as 5:2013cv00693
Plaintiff:
Norris Allen Martin
Defendant:
F Emory Rush, Michael R Culler, Jr, Jack Colman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Williams, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 13-6240
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ALLEN WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Dept. of Corrections
Williams, Jr. v. Clarke
as 1:2011cv01166
Petitioner:
James Allen Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
