Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Amaro Cisneros v. Peacock et al
as 1:2023cv00835
Plaintiff: Tandy Amaro Cisneros
Defendant: Denise Peacock, David Gilbert, Hillary Gurney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisneros v. Peacock et al
as 1:2022cv02522
Plaintiff: Tandy Marie Amaro Cisneros
Defendant: Denise Peacock, Monica Gomez, Jamie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts et al v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv11498
Plaintiff: Herbert Pitts, Nathaniel Boyce, Coreyon Williamson and others
Defendant: Cook County Jail and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. C.O. ADMIRAL et al
as 2:2016cv06403
Plaintiff: JAMIE JONES
Defendant: C.O. ADMIRAL, GAINES, SAMMUELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES II v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv07177
Plaintiff: JAMIE JONES II
Defendant: CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamie Jones v. State of Missouri, et al
as 13-2243
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jamie Jones
Defendant - Appellee: State of Missouri, Donald Hinton, Dr. and Karl Sontheimer, Dr.
Jones v. Attebury
as 4:2013cv00402
Petitioner: Jamie Jones
Respondent: Mary Attebury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Attebury et al
as 5:2012cv06108
Plaintiff: Jamie Jones
Defendant: Mary Attebury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. State of Missouri et al
as 5:2012cv06061
Plaintiff: Jamie Jones
Defendant: State of Missouri, Donald Hinton and Karl Sontheimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. M.D.O.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00071
Petitioner: Jamie Jones
Respondent: M.D.O.C. and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?