Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Dalton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Dalton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Fentress County, Shane Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremy Allen v. Charles Brooks, et al
as 23-3658
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Allen
Defendant:
Dr. James Amsterdam, Medical Director, MN Doc, in His Individual and Official Capacity, Dr. Edward Shaman, M.D., in their individual capacity, Alyas Masih, M.D., in their individual capacity and others
Moreno v. Doctor Avram et al
as 2:2023cv01103
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Moreno
Defendant:
Doctor Avram and Mr Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv01049
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Dalton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Fentress County, Shane Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonsignore v. Washburn
as 2:2022cv00820
Petitioner:
Jeremy James Bonsignore
Respondent:
Superintendent Susan Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ODOM v. BAY MEDICAL et al
as 5:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
JEREMY JAMES ODOM
Defendant:
BAY MEDICAL, CO GREEN, FARMERS BUREAU INSURANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Shaman et al
as 0:2021cv02689
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Allen
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Dr. James Amsterdam, Dr. Edward Shaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Berry
as 7:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Cruz E. Sanchez
Defendant:
Jeremy James Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rummel v. USA
as 6:2021cv00013
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeremy James Rummel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Joseph vs. Rice University, et al
as 4:2020cv04223
Defendant:
Harris County, Ryan Volhmer, Rice University and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
