Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Reed v. Wasner et al
as 2:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lamont Reed and Gerald L. Reed
Defendant:
Todd Wasner, Jane Doe-Brown, John Doe = Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. JONES
as 4:2017cv00593
Petitioner:
JOHN SCOTT MEYERS
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
v. Larry et al
as 4:2014cv05102
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lamont Larry
Defendant:
John Doe Askren, Eric Askren and John Doe Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hupp v. San Diego Superior Court et al
as 3:2012cv00274
Petitioner:
Paul Hupp
Respondent:
San Diego Superior Court , John Sargent Meyer , William D. Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hupp v. San Diego Superior Court, et al.
as 3:2011cv02909
Petitioner:
Paul Hupp
Respondent:
San Diego Superior Court , John Sargent Meyer , William D. Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Meyer v. Ferguson et al
as 1:2010cv02302
Plaintiff:
John M. Meyer, Jr.
Defendant:
(I) Ferguson, Ferguson, (I) Shock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry Rayner v. City of Louisville Metro, et al
as 10-5738
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY WAYNE RAYNER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOUISVILLE METRO, A Municipal Corporation, JERRY ABRAMSON, In his capacity as Mayor Louisville Metro, STEVE BESHEAR, Governor, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Meyer v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2010cv00523
Petitioner:
John J Meyer
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyer v. Walker et al
as 1:2010cv00283
Plaintiff:
John Matthew Meyer
Defendant:
L. (I) W. Walker, L. W. Walker, Deborah (I) Shock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. SPEZIEL
as 2:2010cv00608
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
JERRY SPEZIEL, JOHN DOE MEYERS, PASSAIC COUNTY FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
