Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Green v. USA
as 3:2024cv00726
Petitioner:
John O Green
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dunn v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
John O. Dunn, II
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Joseph Burnette, Mr. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Woofter et al
as 6:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
John O. Miller
Defendant:
Melissa Woofter, Bowman Smelko, Steffani Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicori v. Viator et al
as 4:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Nicori
Defendant:
Brandon Viator, John O. Putikka, Rachel Duvlea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
John Kalu v. Spaulding, et al
as 23-1103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN O. KALU
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. SPAULDING, Warden of FCI-Allenwood, K. MIDDERNATCH, Lieutenant/FCI-Allenwood and K. BITTENBENDER, Discipline Hearing Officer (DHO) FCI-Allenwood
John Williams v. State of Florida
as 23-10058
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN O. WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2022cv00160
Petitioner:
JOHN O WILLIAMS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henson v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00105
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Nunn, Director DOC Scott Crow and others
Petitioner:
Tommie D Henson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henson v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00037
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Nunn, Scott Crow and others
Petitioner:
Tommie D. Henson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00076
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Director DOC Scott Crow, John O and others
Petitioner:
John Henry Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
