Cases 1 - 10 of 182
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
CURTIS GREGORY SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonas Griffin v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10632
Petitioner:
JONAS TRAMELL GRIFFIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Curtis v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Ryan Curtis
Defendant:
Lackawanna County, Wellpath, LLC, Nelson Anthony Iannuzzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feliciano v. Judd et al
as 8:2023cv02661
Plaintiff:
Ramon Antonio Feliciano
Defendant:
Grady Judd, K. McGraw, Don M. Jonas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Jonas v. Nicholas Lamb
as 23-3033
Petitioner / Appellant:
Stephen Robert Jonas
Respondent / Appellee:
Nicholas Lamb, Warden
Haapaniemi v. FCI Jesup Prison et al
as 2:2023cv00083
Petitioner:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Respondent:
Warden FCI Jesup Prison and Jonas Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. City of Aurora, Colorado et al
as 1:2023cv01744
Plaintiff:
Estate of Keith Gibson and Janeel Williams
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Colorado, Thomas Eshelman, Kirk Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Schneider et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Defendant:
Hasza, J Schneider, D Buss and others
Plaintiff:
Garganus Moore
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El v. Boulder County Jail, et al
as 23-1215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLBY JEROME HALE-EL
Defendant / Appellee:
BOULDER COUNTY JAIL, SEAN METCALF, Badge #1469, BADGE #1418 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
