Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Haley Hargis v. Overton County, TN, et al
as 23-6081
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HALEY HARGIS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jonathan Mark Hargis
Defendant:
OVERTON COUNTY, TN
Defendant / Appellant:
J. D. MASTERS
Haley Hargis v. Overton County, TN, et al
as 23-6080
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HALEY HARGIS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jonathan Mark Hargis
Defendant / Appellant:
OVERTON COUNTY, TN, MELISSA BARNES, AMANDA POORE and others
Rose v. Monroe County Courthouse et al
as 3:2018cv02396
Defendant:
Sgt Viera, District Attorney E. Davis Christine, Michael Mancuso and others
Plaintiff:
Devine Rose and Steven Love Lundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. USA
as 1:2016cv00197
Petitioner:
JONATHAN MARK DAVIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Marcus Harris v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 15-5094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marcus B. Harris
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Honorable, Attorney General, U.S. Justice Department and Jonathan Mark Smith, Chief of Civil Rights, Division in Official Capacity
Craig Mrazek v. Michael Puisis, et al
as 15-1473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG MRAZEK
Defendant - Appellee:
GINA ALLEN, LOUIS SHICKER, Doctor, CARLA GREBY, Doctor and others
Evans v. Kirkegard et al
as 9:2014cv00271
Petitioner:
Jonathan Mark Evans
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniels v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 3:2014cv00663
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mark Daniels
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Robert J. Kleinhans and Chung Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mui v. United States of America
as 13-4862
Petitioner - Appellant:
Yick Man Mui
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jonathan Marks
Daniels v. Barns et al
as 3:2013cv01131
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mark Daniels
Defendant:
Monroe Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
