Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Joseph Richards v. Kelly S. Rowe, et al
as 5:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Joseph Richards
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody S. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Joseph Richards
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Maddox
as 5:2023cv00093
Petitioner:
Joseph Richards
Respondent:
Gary Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Richards v. Maddox
as 5:2022cv00285
Petitioner:
Joseph Richards
Respondent:
Gary Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Izzard v. Salazar
as 5:2021cv01144
Petitioner:
Joseph Richard Izzard
Respondent:
BCSO Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richard v. Louisiana et al
as 6:2021cv03647
Defendant:
13th Judicial District Court, State of Louisiana, Police Dept of Mamou and others
Plaintiff:
Emile Joseph Richard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00479
Plaintiff:
Naarl Joseph Richard
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Richard v. Woolery et al
as 3:2021cv00478
Plaintiff:
Naavl Joseph Richard and Naarl Joseph Richard
Defendant:
Lieutenant L. Woolery and Lieutenant T. Marshal
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heintzelman v. Pettis County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv04106
Defendant:
Pettis County Jail, Sedalia, Missouri and 18th Judicial Circuit Court
Plaintiff:
Joseph Richard Heintzelman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHATFIELD et al v. LUKEMIRE et al
as 5:2019cv00506
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RICHARD MAZZA, RAYMOND CHATFIELD, JR and DUSTIN MCDANIELS
Defendant:
JUDGE EDWARD D LUKEMIRE, JOHN DOES, REBECCA LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
