Cases 1 - 10 of 211
Loyde v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Loyde, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Moran v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Moran, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Nevada and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Hernandez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Gonzalez-Hernandez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rojas v. Mogannan et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Rojas
Defendant:
Kyli Mogannan and FNV Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez Gonzalez v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02190
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Perez Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez Martinez
as 5:2023cv02887
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Sanchez Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez Martinez v. Freitas et al
as 4:2023cv02508
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Sanchez Martinez
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Freitas, Lt C Ramirez, Lt. B. Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Cardenas
as 23-40247
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Julio Cesar Cardenas
Castillo v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01345
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Castillo
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prado v. Christensen
as 9:2023cv00341
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Prado
Respondent:
D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
