Cases 1 - 10 of 2,720
Michalski v. Purillo et al
as 1:2024cv04038
Plaintiff:
Cortez Michalski
Defendant:
Purillo, Well Path and Mike Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Little et al
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
George Little, John Wetzel, Thomas McGinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00848
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Shawn Otte v. Arron Wilson, et al
as 24-1992
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Arron Wilson, Chandra Bankhead, Michael Fusselman and others
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01234
Petitioner:
Anthony Kelley
Respondent:
Andre Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Kauwe v. Nicole Caceres et al
as 8:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kauwe
Defendant:
Nicole Caceres, Stacey Berardino, Clayton Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Kelley et al
as 9:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
London Lucas and London H. Lucas
Defendant:
Kelley, Dr. Macri, RN Napoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Schuylkill County Prison
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Owen James Kelley
Defendant:
Schuylkill County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSS v. WOODCOCK et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
JUDGE WOODCOCK, ANDREW MCCORMACK, SCOTT KELLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
