Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith #620214 v. Wrigglesworth et al
as 1:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Javone Smith #620214
Defendant:
Scott Wrigglesworth, Andrew R. Book, Darin Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wrigglesworth et al
as 2:2023cv11250
Plaintiff:
Javone Smith
Defendant:
Scott Wrigglesworth, Andrew R. Book, Darin Southworth and others
Spalding v. Eaton, County of et al
as 1:2018cv00819
Defendant:
Robert Davis, Doug R. Sharp, Melissa Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Kindi Spalding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00854
Plaintiff:
The Undersigned Prisoners and Kenneth Tyler
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Negbenebor et al
as 4:2012cv01054
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Tyler
Defendant:
Ke Negbenebor and Cheryl Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brent Tyler v. Darral Adams, et al
as 10-15892
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRENT KENNETH TYLER
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRAL G. ADAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Wiley v. Biscoe, et al
as 09-40183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK BISCOE, DOROTHY BURNS, WARNER LUMPKINS and others
Wiley v. Biscoe, et al
as 08-41336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK BISCOE, DOROTHY BURNS, WARNER LUMPKINS and others
Wiley v. Biscoe, et al
as 08-41199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK BISCOE, DOROTHY BURNS, WARNER LUMPKINS and others
Tyler v. Adams et al
as 2:2007cv00367
Petitioner:
Brent Kenneth Tyler
Respondent:
Darral G. Adams and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
