Cases 1 - 10 of 15
EL v. MOSES et al
as 1:2022cv02421
Plaintiff:
KAL SHAREEF EL
Defendant:
KEVIN R. MOSES, JUDGE NANCY RIDGWAY, CARY SHILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Wilson et al
as 1:2022cv00635
Plaintiff:
James Christopher Jones, Priscilla Kal and Jeanne Kal
Defendant:
Dr. Julia Wilson and VonSheila Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL et al v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
MIKAL S. MITCHELL, KAL SHAREEF EL, SERGIO ROSADO and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY, DAVID KELSEY, ARAMARK CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeVries v. Wright et al
as 4:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Bruce Wayne DeVries
Defendant:
Rodney Wright, Carpenter, Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kal Kenfield v. Douglas Fender, et al
as 17-36039
Petitioner - Appellant:
KAL KENFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUGLAS FENDER, Warden and TIMOTHY FOX
Smith v. Pratt et al
as 6:2017cv01055
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Kiesha Pratt, Larry Simpson, Jr., Larry Simpson, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Police Officer Clayton et al
as 6:2017cv00961
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Police Officer Clayton, Officer Simons, Police Officer Ms. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wilford et al
as 6:2017cv00945
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Mike Wilford, D. Hernandaze, Officer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenfield v. Fender et al
as 4:2016cv00119
Petitioner:
Kal Kenfield
Respondent:
Douglas Fender and Timothy Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Denis v. State of Florida et al
as 0:2016cv61721
Plaintiff:
Gregory Godfroy Denis
Defendant:
State of Florida, Camille Dumornay, Dave Weissman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
